mtnbikej
J-Zilla
Of course, but federal rules banning the Holy Jim Volunteer Fire Dept. from using creek water to protect the cabins and the FS stating that they had a plan to protect the cabins does not allow for quick local suppression. And I'm not sure, but I don't remember the cabins having the standard brush (and tree) clearance that could've also bought some time--either to help protect the cabins or to keep a fire from jumping from the cabins to the forest. Maybe unavoidable in a narrow canyon like this, what with oak tree/habitat protections we have--although the oaks and/or natural topography didn't fair well in Saddle Crest, the new neighborhood across from the stables on Santiago Canyon Road.
There's also an interesting email exchange in the article's comment section between Holy Jim's Michael Milligan and Peter Fahnestock of the USGS concerning whether or not the cabins are situated in a flood plain (for a 100 year flood). It's my understanding that the recent study claims the flood line is 40 to 50 feet above the cabins. If true, that'd be a massive flood and possibly devastating county-wide. I've read in the past that the Santa Ana River floodplain below Santa Ana canyon was (or is) considered the biggest flood hazard west of the Mississippi, and Prado and 7-Oaks dams, along with river channelization, were built to protect that part of Orange County. "The Great Flood of 1862" was called a thousand-year flood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Ana_River (see Floods, drought and legacy)
Exactly, it really never been a question of “if” but “ when”. Eventually it was gonna happen.
However no one outside the canyon thought it could have been one of its own purposely because of a feud with neighbors. This is the part of the story we have only been provided with a small amount.
Now that it was started, yeah....all bets are off why certain things didn’t get done certain ways.