If there are two schools of thought
@Mikie, I'm in neither. It is a big deal, but the numbers are deceptive and are being used to show that it is and simultaneously that it isn't a big deal.
- It is highly contagious.
- It is carried by people who are mostly asymptomatic.
- It can be spread for weeks before symptoms arise.
- It is more deadly and damaging than regular flu (between slightly and 10x more deadly, depending on what numbers you ascribe to) - especially in concentration.
- We don't have a vaccine.
- We don't have enough tests.
- We don't have an effective treatment.
- We don't have enough protection, medical equipment or supplies to deal with the large numbers that pop up in some areas (and left unchecked, could quickly overwhelm any specific location).
- Places where it has taken hold have been horribly overwhelmed.
I don't know that anybody from "either side" would argue those statements. If those are givens, then we cannot conclude that we should just ignore it and treat it like any other flu. So I think a measured, systematic, planned response at this point is the best way forward. Not throwing open the gates, undoing all of the work we've done and saying "OK, we're fine now. We can handle it." We probably shouldn't rush it, but we certainly won't need to wait until it's eradicated, just until we can manage it like we do other infectious diseases. I'd love it if we could start responsibly opening up businesses as we get the tests, medicines, equipment, supplies and education in place and ready. I really don't see us re-opening schools this year though, although I wish we could do so safely.
Be well y'all!
Great list (IMO), and I'll add:
1) Varying reports suggest you may be able to re-contract it.
2) It could be like the 1918 variety and seem to leave, then return more virulent and deadly about six months later.
3) It's a horrible way to die (is there a good one?), alone on a ventilator.
4) It can be devastating - 45 residents in a senior facility somewhere in the south dead .