New Bike Day!

It's interesting how all these bikes are coming with 1x11 or 1x12 drive trains. I don't think I'll ever need a front derailleur again. I'll never be a single-speed guy, but 12 gears seem like more than enough (for me).
Agreed. 1×11 with 30t and 10-42 cassette is near perfect for me though yesterday I would have loved to have Jennifer's 32t and 10-50 cassette on a couple of the climbs.
 
I think I'll just get this Megatower:
Megatower Park Edition.png


Even has room for a water bottle inside the frame! :thumbsup:
 
Thanks guys, but I'm gonna steer away from a bike that weighs 36 lbs. I'm not as strong as you beasts.
The 00s are over. It’s okay to have a bike that weights 30+. Especially fir you gargantuan sized people. You’ll notice the weight when you put it on the rack or stand. Otherwise you wont. Especially with that geo, look at that sad STA on the Mega, no thanks.
 
Help me understand how that frees up designers??
I'm not an engineer, so I am merely repeating what I've read and what sounds likely. It stands to reason that trying to create a stable place to mount a front derailleur that stays aligned and accurate creates some design constraints in terms of tubing shape, chainline, pivot locations, chainstay length and more. Once they stopped worrying about front derailleurs, chainstays got shorter (on 29 ers), pivot locations moved to more advantageous locations, there was room for wider tires, etc. Am I wrong?

Where would you put a front derailleur on this? Did this not free up designers to run a straight, uninterrupted seat tube and put the suspension linkage in a better location, adding torsional stiffness to a critical part of the bike?

Hightower Linkage.png
 
Last edited:
I'm not an engineer, so I am merely repeating what I've read and what sounds likely. It stands to reason that trying to create a stable place to mount a front derailleur that stays aligned and accurate creates some design constraints in terms of tubing shape, chainline, pivot locations, chainstay length and more. Once they stopped worrying about front derailleurs, chainstays got shorter (on 29 ers), pivot locations moved to more advantageous locations, there was room for wider tires, etc. Am I wrong?
I'm no engineer but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and your explanation sounds spot on.
 
The 00s are over. It’s okay to have a bike that weights 30+. Especially fir you gargantuan sized people. You’ll notice the weight when you put it on the rack or stand. Otherwise you wont. Especially with that geo, look at that sad STA on the Mega, no thanks.
The Mega in the picture has a 200mm dual crown fork attached to it. I posted that as a semi-joke. The effective seat tube angles on the Mega and the Hightower are both about 76.3° (XXL) - plenty steep and roughly the same as the Smash (75.9).

As an XL guy who likes stout, sturdy bikes with 5.5-6.5" of travel, I have gotten used to my bikes weighing 30 lbs, +/- 1 lb. I noticed the weight difference between the Hightower and Megatower when I test rode them.

Seems you won't relent unless I agree that an aluminum Smash with a coil shock is the right bike for me. OK - the aluminum Smash with a coil shock is the best bike for me, but I am not going to buy one, because I am obviously stupid, uninformed, unenlighted and unskilled. :thumbsup:

PS: @littlewave - wanna chime in here?
 
Last edited:
The Mega in the picture has a 200mm dual crown fork attached to it. I posted that as a semi-joke. The seat tube angles on the Mega and the Hightower are both about 76.3° (XXL) - plenty steep and roughly the same as the Smash (75.9).

As an XL guy who likes stout, sturdy bikes with 5-6.5" of travel, I have gotten used to my bikes weighing 30 lbs, +/- 1 lb. I noticed the weight difference between the Hightower and Megatower when I test rode them.

Seems you won't relent unless I agree that an aluminum Smash with a coil shock is the right bike for me. OK - the aluminum Smash with a coil shock is the best bike for me, but I am not going to buy one, because I am obviously stupid, uninformed, unenlighted and unskilled. :thumbsup:
Haha!! You never know for sure until ya try. :)Was I that insistent? I don’t like to pressure anyone...you got this. :D
 
I'm not an engineer, so I am merely repeating what I've read and what sounds likely. It stands to reason that trying to create a stable place to mount a front derailleur that stays aligned and accurate creates some design constraints in terms of tubing shape, chainline, pivot locations, chainstay length and more. Once they stopped worrying about front derailleurs, chainstays got shorter (on 29 ers), pivot locations moved to more advantageous locations, there was room for wider tires, etc. Am I wrong?


winner-winner-chicken-dinner-golf-tournament-8.jpg
 
Back
Top