UPSed
iMTB Hooligan
27.5?Mondraker Foxy?
27.5?Mondraker Foxy?
I've seen one at The Path... In fact, I've seen two.Not that I believe you're getting a Mondraker, but I am curious if you've ever seen one on your local trails?
Agreed. 1×11 with 30t and 10-42 cassette is near perfect for me though yesterday I would have loved to have Jennifer's 32t and 10-50 cassette on a couple of the climbs.It's interesting how all these bikes are coming with 1x11 or 1x12 drive trains. I don't think I'll ever need a front derailleur again. I'll never be a single-speed guy, but 12 gears seem like more than enough (for me).
It's interesting how all these bikes are coming with 1x11 or 1x12 drive trains. I don't think I'll ever need a front derailleur again. I'll never be a single-speed guy, but 12 gears seem like more than enough (for me).
Dinosaurs have not left us completely.We will see pinion gearboxes/internal transmissions before we ever see front derailleurs again.
FD's have gone the way of the Dodo and dinosaurs.
Too many shortcomings for Herzie and most anyone but maybe Scissors, and it’s a piss poor climber, so...
Dinosaurs have not left us completely.
Just look up in the sky. That's them flying by, in their modern design.
Too many shortcomings for Herzie and most anyone but maybe Scissors, and it’s a piss poor climber, so...
Thank you for adding that David!Or on the ground! Chickens are the closest relation to dinosaurs around now.
Opposite of what Scissors wants. The Foxy's strength is descending.Too many shortcomings for Herzie and most anyone but maybe Scissors, and it’s a piss poor climber, so...
Nah, he wouldn’t notice one way or the other. Measurements don’t apply. It has 2 wheels, pedals, a saddle, and a handlebar of irrelevant width. It’s a bike.Opposite of what Scissors wants. The Foxy's strength is descending.
Hi, I’m a Chicken Nugget, and I approve this message. It’s a lot of bike for $1,800 bones.This should fit you, herz.
https://www.pinkbike.com/buysell/2695440/
@Sassyquatch and @DangerDirtyD might endorse it.
Hi, I’m a Chicken Nugget, and I approve this message. It’s a lot of bike for $1,800 bones.
I think I'll just get this Megatower:
View attachment 60708
Even has room for a water bottle inside the frame!
Yep, frame only with a fancy coil shock. List price on the PB classifieds rarely is the selling price...Hi, I’m a Chicken Nugget, and I approve this message. It’s a lot of bike for $1,800 bones.
Thanks guys, but I'm gonna steer away from a bike that weighs 36 lbs. I'm not as strong as you beasts.Yep, frame only with a fancy coil shock. List price on the PB classifieds rarely is the selling price...
The 00s are over. It’s okay to have a bike that weights 30+. Especially fir you gargantuan sized people. You’ll notice the weight when you put it on the rack or stand. Otherwise you wont. Especially with that geo, look at that sad STA on the Mega, no thanks.Thanks guys, but I'm gonna steer away from a bike that weighs 36 lbs. I'm not as strong as you beasts.
Help me understand how that frees up designers??The elimination of the front derailleur has freed up frame designers to come up with more acceptable geometry for 29 inch wheels and longer travel.
I'm not an engineer, so I am merely repeating what I've read and what sounds likely. It stands to reason that trying to create a stable place to mount a front derailleur that stays aligned and accurate creates some design constraints in terms of tubing shape, chainline, pivot locations, chainstay length and more. Once they stopped worrying about front derailleurs, chainstays got shorter (on 29 ers), pivot locations moved to more advantageous locations, there was room for wider tires, etc. Am I wrong?Help me understand how that frees up designers??
I'm no engineer but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and your explanation sounds spot on.I'm not an engineer, so I am merely repeating what I've read and what sounds likely. It stands to reason that trying to create a stable place to mount a front derailleur that stays aligned and accurate creates some design constraints in terms of tubing shape, chainline, pivot locations, chainstay length and more. Once they stopped worrying about front derailleurs, chainstays got shorter (on 29 ers), pivot locations moved to more advantageous locations, there was room for wider tires, etc. Am I wrong?
The Mega in the picture has a 200mm dual crown fork attached to it. I posted that as a semi-joke. The effective seat tube angles on the Mega and the Hightower are both about 76.3° (XXL) - plenty steep and roughly the same as the Smash (75.9).The 00s are over. It’s okay to have a bike that weights 30+. Especially fir you gargantuan sized people. You’ll notice the weight when you put it on the rack or stand. Otherwise you wont. Especially with that geo, look at that sad STA on the Mega, no thanks.
Haha!! You never know for sure until ya try. Was I that insistent? I don’t like to pressure anyone...you got this.The Mega in the picture has a 200mm dual crown fork attached to it. I posted that as a semi-joke. The seat tube angles on the Mega and the Hightower are both about 76.3° (XXL) - plenty steep and roughly the same as the Smash (75.9).
As an XL guy who likes stout, sturdy bikes with 5-6.5" of travel, I have gotten used to my bikes weighing 30 lbs, +/- 1 lb. I noticed the weight difference between the Hightower and Megatower when I test rode them.
Seems you won't relent unless I agree that an aluminum Smash with a coil shock is the right bike for me. OK - the aluminum Smash with a coil shock is the best bike for me, but I am not going to buy one, because I am obviously stupid, uninformed, unenlighted and unskilled.
I'm not an engineer, so I am merely repeating what I've read and what sounds likely. It stands to reason that trying to create a stable place to mount a front derailleur that stays aligned and accurate creates some design constraints in terms of tubing shape, chainline, pivot locations, chainstay length and more. Once they stopped worrying about front derailleurs, chainstays got shorter (on 29 ers), pivot locations moved to more advantageous locations, there was room for wider tires, etc. Am I wrong?