Not bashing anyone here but I think we are just using the wrong terminology...
A Theory is just that, a theory. Adding the word “Scientific” in front of it does not make it more valid. A theory is nothing more than a guess. A scientific theory is nothing more that a scientific guess based on science that “potentially” could lead to a conclusion.
I don’t think that phrase relates to the subject. I “think” what you were trying to say was “Mathematically” a Lower bottom bracket will result in a higher probability of Pedal Strike. Which I totally agree with.
@mountaingirl sara , I would be cautious in changing the geometry of your bike. As much as I love my Hightower and wish the bottom bracket was higher... it is what it is. I’m not going to blame my crash for example on the geometry of my new bike. I’m going to learn from it, adapt, and then go hammer differently.
Like a lot of guys here have stated, it’s one of those things you now take in to account for and develop ride skills around.
When I started riding the Hightower, I was locking out my rear shock to reduce the fluffy climbing aspect (which raised my B.B. height due to less sag), then I got used to the fluff, and now I’m back to locking it out. That will help with a lower B.B. on the climbs. I try to keep the fork light and drive through the rear wheel. I agree with
@herzalot that locking your fork is great for road climbs, and I do lock mine out on road climbs.
I say, grow with the bikes geometry. Adjust saddle position and handlebar height and distance to grab more climbing capability.
I was watching Cathy climb the other day and realized I had her seat waaaayy too far back. She was pedaling from behind. After moving it forward she said it made all the difference! She didn’t know what she didn’t know. She relies on me to know this stuff.
I hope this helps!
