Carbon Chameleon is now out!!

So only available in C Carbon....so not much of a savings in weight. 1.2 lbs for the S Kit....only difference being the brakes Guide T vs. Level TL

Dig the matching Hope Hubs/HS.....but from a price standpoint, a downgrade from the DT 350.

Great that you can still run 140mm fork.

It's about time they made a carbon SS frame.

Like the color.

Now I just need to break my Al frame.
 
I LOVE my Chameleon's geometry, but don't like what I consider a harsh frame. If the carbon can dial some of that out, and shave some weight it could be a great frame for me in the future!
Not having both bottles in the triangle is still a negative for me.

Looks like 1.11# difference between the S carbon (26.19) and S aluminum (27.3).
 
And with what looks like adjustable dropouts... oh my. :eek: The pricing doesn't seem too bad for the frame, but that sub $1000 Ibis is also pretty attractive.
Yeah, the DB9 looks pretty nice... and it fits both bottles in there!

So only available in C Carbon....so not much of a savings in weight. 1.2 lbs for the S Kit....only difference being the brakes Guide T vs. Level TL

Dig the matching Hope Hubs/HS.....but from a price standpoint, a downgrade from the DT 350.

Great that you can still run 140mm fork.

It's about time they made a carbon SS frame.

Like the color.

Now I just need to break my Al frame.

I love those colors... one of my favorite color schemes!
 
I LOVE my Chameleon's geometry, but don't like what I consider a harsh frame. If the carbon can dial some of that out, and shave some weight it could be a great frame for me in the future!
Not having both bottles in the triangle is still a negative for me.

Looks like 1.11# difference between the S carbon (26.19) and S aluminum (27.3).
Look to titanium young lad. There, you will find a more forgiving ride quality.
 
I LOVE my Chameleon's geometry, but don't like what I consider a harsh frame. If the carbon can dial some of that out, and shave some weight it could be a great frame for me in the future!
Not having both bottles in the triangle is still a negative for me.

Looks like 1.11# difference between the S carbon (26.19) and S aluminum (27.3).

I don't find the Al frame to be harsh at all. Maybe it's all the years on Al HB's that got me used to it. But the Chameleon has a much nicer ride than the HB.
 
Look to titanium young lad. There, you will find a more forgiving ride quality.

Ti would be great, but quite the investment. Local guy is going to start making frames... I might have him copy a Chameleon with 853 tubing!

I don't find the Al frame to be harsh at all. Maybe it's all the years on Al HB's that got me used to it. But the Chameleon has a much nicer ride than the HB.

Coming from my Gunnar, the lizard is a lot rougher. Even with the plusher fork. Or maybe I'm just going faster.
Nah, probably not that...
 
Last edited:
I LOVE my Chameleon's geometry, but don't like what I consider a harsh frame. If the carbon can dial some of that out, and shave some weight it could be a great frame for me in the future!
Not having both bottles in the triangle is still a negative for me.

Looks like 1.11# difference between the S carbon (26.19) and S aluminum (27.3).
Okay, David said it first...

My first though: Stiffer than the alloy? :eek:

Perceptions and reference...all over the map. :geek: Looks like a cool frame for some; I imagine it’ll be popular.
 
I like this video better. There's also a "First Impressions" article on bikepacking.com


Don't call me Guy, Guy is the review that sold me on the original Chameleon. Although does he ever do reviews when he doesn't like something?
SRAM honking @ 5:40... I wish SC moved away from Levels...

This frame looked real good until I saw that video :stop:

I liked it! Looks like they had fun.
 
Interesting...

From the Bikepacking.com article:

Most notably, the Carbon Chameleon got an 8mm higher bottom bracket. Although I haven’t tried the aluminum version, I’ve found the current clearance to be spot on. The C also has a slightly shorter reach and a hair slacker head tube angle, resulting in an 8mm longer wheelbase. There are a few other minor tweaks, such as a 4mm shorter reach and a 3mm higher stack, but otherwise, it’s generally the same creature, aside from the build.
 
Interesting...

From the Bikepacking.com article:

Most notably, the Carbon Chameleon got an 8mm higher bottom bracket. Although I haven’t tried the aluminum version, I’ve found the current clearance to be spot on. The C also has a slightly shorter reach and a hair slacker head tube angle, resulting in an 8mm longer wheelbase. There are a few other minor tweaks, such as a 4mm shorter reach and a 3mm higher stack, but otherwise, it’s generally the same creature, aside from the build.

What's funny is that it depends on which bike you are looking at.....29 vs. 27.5+ The latter doesn't change anything but BB by 1mm, while the former has a few different tweeks....mostly in the L frame size.
 
Can Santa Cruz please get a real Head Tube Badge instead of a copy over from Whirlpool? :facepalm:
Personally, I think a stamped metal image of Boy George's head would make a great Chameleon head badge for this new bike frame.

Add to that a small internal music box tucked away inside the top tube with a pull string that plays the "Carba-carba-carba-carba-carba Chameleon" song.
 
Back
Top